04
Nov
McDonalds Coffee Lawsuit Facts Lets set the facts straight about this case. With the opening of Ralph.
In 2012 Jennifer Fragoso was served hot cider from Dunkin Donuts that was hot beyond.
Hot coffee mcdonalds lawsuit. The Real Story Behind the McDonalds Hot Coffee Lawsuit Details Paint a Different Picture. But did any of us really know the details of the story. With the opening of Ralph.
Serious Burn Potential Well-Known. Liebeck was concerned about the. McDonalds Coffee Lawsuit Facts Lets set the facts straight about this case.
On February 27 1992 79-year-old Stella Liebeck was sitting in the passenger seat of her 1989 Ford Probe with hot coffee on her lap after going through a McDonalds drive-through window. Her grandson was driving her car which did not have cup holders. Back in 1992 as most people tell it a woman ordered a hot coffee at McDonalds spilled it and suffered some minor burns only to turn around sue the popular chain restaurant and get rich on something seemingly frivolous.
McDonalds refused to raise its compensation offer above 800. Stella Liebeck filed suit. Her lawsuit asked for 100000 in compensatory damages including for her pain and suffering and triple punitive damages.
These punitive damages were sought in order to send a message to McDonalds that their coffee was dangerously hot. In total Mrs. Liebeck sought to settle with McDonalds for 20000.
Enter attorney Reed Morgan The now infamous Hot Coffee Lawsuit began when Mrs. Liebeck sought the help of a personal injury attorney in a law office in Santa Fe New Mexico. The 10 Best Spilled Hot Coffee Lawsuits In History Fragoso v.
In 2012 Jennifer Fragoso was served hot cider from Dunkin Donuts that was hot beyond. On a Houston-bound Southwest flight in 2012 43-year-old Angelica Keller was. The McDonalds Hot Coffee Lawsuit - What You Didnt Hear Published May 6th 2008 Probably at some point you have heard of the woman who spilled hot coffee in her lap and sued McDonalds for millions.
What you usually hear is how this woman drove into the drive-thru at McDonalds and bought hot coffee that she then stuck between her legs. McDonalds argued that their customers knew the coffee was hot and the customers wanted it that way. There was a statement on the side of the cup but McDonalds agreed that it was only a reminder that the coffee was hot.
The writing on the cup was not located in a position to serve as an actual warning and McDonalds admitted to this fact. McDonalds Restaurantsmore commonly known as the McDonalds hot coffee lawsuitis often cited as a classic example of frivolous litigation in the United States. In much of the publics eye Stella Lieback was a greedy plaintiff who spilled warm coffee on her lap while driving and decided to cash in by suing a big corporation for millions of dollars.
Stella Liebeck the 79-year-old woman who was severely burned by McDonalds coffee that she spilled in her lap in 1992 was unfairly held up as an example of frivolous litigation in the public eye. But the facts of the case tell a very different story. The hot coffee lawsuit was a 1994 product liability.
Called the case the poster child of excessive lawsuits they absorbed the coffee and held it against her skin scalding her thighs buttocks and groin. There was indeed a lawsuit filed against McDonalds for its too- hot coffee. In 1992 Stella Liebeck a 79-year old retired sales clerk bought a 49-cent cup of coffee from a drive-through McDonalds in Albuquerque New Mexico.
She was in the passenger seat of a car driven by her grandson. Liebeck placed the cup between her legs and removed the lid to add cream and sugar when the hot coffee spilled out on her lap causing third-degree burns on her groin inner. On behalf of House Law LLC posted in blog on August 22 2019 The infamous McDonalds Hot Coffee Lawsuit is often lauded as an example of frivolous lawsuits brought by people who are just trying to scam businesses into paying them money.
McDonalds Hot Coffee Lawsuit. One of the most successful campaigns in the history of misinformation about tort law was the infamous McDonalds hot coffee lawsuit. When this case was made public the entire nation almost instantly turned against the elderly lady and her lawsuit or at least made fun of it.
And it turns out almost everything. The truth behind the hot coffee lawsuit. The elderly woman who became a punchline had 16 of her body covered in burns and McDonalds had.